Inference: International Review of Science Feedback & Comments November 2018 David Adger Professor of Linguistics at Queen Mary University of London. “Thanks for the hardcopy of the last issue. It was really interesting,” Egil Asprem Associate Professor in the History of Religions at Stockholm University. “It is exciting to see text moving toward production - and quite an impressive job by the editors in cutting the text so much while retaining the essentials in an elegant way!” “It's been a pleasure working with you!” Pamela Asquith Professor of Anthropology, University of Alberta. “The journal looks very interesting indeed and I feel it is an honor to be invited to contribute.” Jeremy Avigad Professor of Philosophy at Carnegie Mellon University. “I have been reading and enjoying a number of articles in Inference. I am impressed; it is a very nice publication.” Jeremy Bersntein Professor emeritus of physics at the Stevens Institute of Technology. “So many thanks. This worked out very well. The editing was excellent although the caricature of me looked more like Donald Trump than me! I hope to work with you in the future” “I read the issue with great interest and was pleased to see my quantum there.” “I thank the editors for their good editing. ” 1 Inference: International Review of Science Feedback & Comments Robert Berwick Professor of Computational Linguistics and Computer Science and Engineering at MIT. “I am truly delighted that you and others have started publishing such a journal as Inference, which touches on so many of my own concerns and interests - I have been meaning for years to write articles on evolutionary theory (some like the fine ones you’ve already published); on big data and its discontents (I have one on the deep troubles with deep learning); on the sloppy connectome neuroscience (which you’ve covered); and so on - in fact, many of the topics on your “hit list”. Your abbreviations alone are priceless.” Simon Blackburn Professor of Philosophy a