Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 168/Tuesday, August 30, 2011/Rules and Regulations 54045 a Some comments assert that the notice is not defaced or torn down. The __ posting of the employee notice required content of the notice will prompt rule does not require, or even suggest, by § 104.202. As noted in § 104.202(e), employee questions, which managers that employers must spend thousands of the Board will make the notice and supervisors will have to answer, dollars to install tamper-proof bulletin available, and employers will be and be trained to answer, and that the boards or that employers must permitted to post copies of the notice Board failed to account for the cost of constantly monitor the notice.?°% that are exact duplicates in content, such training and discussions in terms One comment contends that most size, format, and type size and style. of lost work time.2°5 Other comments small employers do not have 11 x 17- Under the regulations implementing the contend that employers will incur costs inch color printers, and therefore will PRA, “[t]he public disclosure of of opposing an increased number of have to have the posters printed information originally supplied by the union organizing campaigns. 2% commercially at a cost that, alone, Federal government to [a] recipient for Relatedly, several comments state that assertedly will exceed the Board’s the purpose of disclosure to the public” employers should be allowed to, and/or _ estimate of the cost of the rule. The is not considered a “collection of will respond to the notice by informing Board understands the concerns of this —_ information’ under the Act. See 5 CFR employees of aspects of unionization small employer. The Board points out 1320.3(c)(2). Therefore, contrary to and collective bargaining that are not that it will furnish a reasonable number several comments, the posting covered by the notice; some suggest that of copies of the notice free of charge to requirement is not subject to the employers ma