54044 Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 168/Tuesday, August 30, 2011/Rules and Regulations will not have a significant economic to the rule’s projected compliance costs should not be necessary for employers, impact on a substantial number of small to small entities (mone of which would _ small or large, to add human resources entities. 5 U.S.C. 605(b) (emphasis result from posting a workplace notice), staff, retain counsel, or resort to added). The Board understands the not the kinds of speculative and indirect litigation if they have questions “economic impact of * * * the rule’ to economic impact that Baker & Daniels concerning whether the proposed rule refer to the costs to affected entities of LLC invokes,?°° applies to them or about the complying with the rule, not to the Associated Builders and Contractors, requirements for technical compliance economic impact of a series of Inc. (ABC) and Retail Industry Leaders —_ with the rule, including how the subsequent decisions made by Association (RILA) contend that the electronic posting provisions individual actors in the economy that Board’s RFA analysis fails to account for specifically affect their enterprises.2°2 are neither compelled by, nor the the costs of electronic notice posting, Such questions can be directed to the inevitable result of, the rule.197 Even if especially for employers that Board’s regional offices, either by more employees opt for union communicate with employees via telephone, personal visit, email, or representation after learning about their multiple electronic means. Both regular mail, and will be answered free rights, employers can avoid the adverse comments deplore what they consider of charge by representatives of the effects on business costs, flexibility, and to be the rule’s vague requirements in Board.2°3 profitability predicted by Baker & this respect. ABC argues that clear Cass County Electric Cooperative Daniels LLP and other commenters by guidance is needed, and that the Board _