Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 168/Tuesday, August 30, 2011/Rules and Regulations 54025 interpretation would be reasonable, including an entire list of special you to Immigration and Customs because it is contrary to the plain circumstances, concerning both the Enforcement (ICE) or to other law language of the notice. The notice states wearing of union insignia and other enforcement authorities in order to that promises or grants of benefits “‘to matters (e.g., striking and picketing, initinniaby or. retaliate agauiel hs Deusmse discourage or encourage union support’ soliciting and distributing union ongege in. cami d activity “a ruta ve 7 are unlawful. It would make little sense _ literature), would make it impossible to and protection. to use such language if the Board had summarize NLRA rights on an 11x17 . . meant that any promises or grants of inch poster. In any event, the Board me Board finds ‘ unnecessaly to add benefits were unlawful, rather than only finds that the general caveat that special this Soa tee The nine states i att those with the unlawful stated circumstances may defeat the a Lamkin “fe ernpeoye e Ie, purposes. And stating that such application of the general rule, coupled pemole, rane al ack 5 Be ms yen. promises or grants to * * * encourage with the advice to employees to contact ke» Wy change Yaurishill,. ox aterwise union support are unlawful necessarily — the NLRB with specific questions about i © GAVETSE action against You, OF implies that not all promises and grants __ particular issues, achieves the balance i reaten to take any of these actions, of benefits discourage union support. required for an employee notice of ecause you join or support a union, or . Pare ; aoe rights about wearing union insignia in because Aiea ea concerted F vi. Prohibitions on Union Insignia the workplace activity for mutual aid and protection A few comments suggest that the .. . . . (emphasis added) [.]” Reporting or provision fails to illuminate the vii. S