54018 Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 168/Tuesday, August 30, 2011/Rules and Regulations Some comments argue that the procedures related to allegations of derived from Board and court decisions, Board’s notice posting rule does not go noncompliance and enforcement ofthe of conduct that violates the NLRA will far enough to effectuate the NLRA. One rule. The discussion below is organized assist employees in understanding their labor attorney argues that the Board in the same manner and explains the rights. 75 FR 80412. should require annual trainings for Board’s reasoning in adopting the Prior to issuing the NPRM, the Board supervisors and captive audience standards and procedures containedin _ carefully reviewed the content of the meetings where employees are read the regulatory text, including the notice required under the Department of their rights by supervisors and Board Board’s responses to the comments Labor’s final rule, which was modified agents and the employees would have to received. in response to comments from Foe ee mc Subpart ADefnitions, Requirements "unre sures and entatey captive audience meetings by fox Emiployee-Nopice, and Exceptions empl syee ri h cour tel ‘and From Coverage Definitions employee rights accurately an . employers. The comment concludes that effectively without going into excessive the NPRM ‘“‘doesn’t go anywhere near A. The Definitions or confusing detail. The Board therefore far enough. It is, however, an important For the most part, the definitions found it unnecessary, for purposes of and worthwhile advancement.” 94 proposed in the rule are taken from the proposed rulemaking, to modify the Another comment also suggests that those appearing in Section 2 of the language of the notice in the Department annual, mandatory training classes for NLRA, 29 U.S.C. 152. No comments of Labor’s final rule. Moreover, the employees would be desirable.% The were received concerning those Board reasoned that because the notice Board believes th