Federal Register/Vol. 76, No. 168/Tuesday, August 30, 2011/Rules and Regulations 54017 eeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee eee In support of their contention that —We are not anti-union; but feel as- will not be effective in informing NLRA rights are widely known among Americans, we must protect our right not ~—_ employees of their rights, because employees, several comments observe 2 be atgpaLOLy toa third party in our employees will simply ignore the that the Board’s processes for holding sess. : notices, as the comments contend they . —If one desires to be a part of a union, he h kol . representation elections and or she is free to apply to those companies ignore other workp ace postings. investigating and remedying unfair that operate with that form of “Posters are an ineffective means of labor practices are invoked tens of relationship.®6 educating workers and are rarely read thousands of time a year.®° That is true. |—l also believe employees already have such by employees.’ 9° Other comments However, the civilian work force notice by understanding they retain the argue that adding one more notice to the includes some 108 million workers right to change employers whenever they —_ many that are already mandated under otentially subject to the NLRA.®1 Thus, fio Bian: other statutes will simply create more p y J : . : 1 ply | the number of employees who invoke These comments reinforce the Board’s “visual clutter” that contributes to the Board’s processes make up only a belief that, in addition to informing employees’ disinclination to pay small percentage of the covered employees of their NLRA rights so that —_ attention to posted notices. As one workforce. Accordingly, the Board does _ they may better exercise those rights, employer stated, “My bulletin boards not consider the number of times the posting the notice may have the are filled with required notifications Board’s processes are invoked to be beneficial side effect of informing that nobody reads. In