James PaTTERSON 2 EF number and they called, is my recollection. That’s my best ; involved. But I knew shi recollection. j yes, but I didn’t know, < | prepared to be a witne: | question. 10:45 a.m. 4 : Q: So from the very first conversation that you had with this 4 i 11:08 a.m. person, you had information indicating that this person was 4 ' informing you that Bradley Edwards had engaged in unethi- i | Q: Was any request made b cal conduct, correct? a A: Yes. | A: Let me just be very clear what she said to me. She said to me : i Q: Let me back up then, if] that she had been told directly by her friend Virginia Rob- 4 q you to do, based upon yo erts, who stayed with her overnight for a period of time, that 4 : much detail as you poss she never wanted to mention me in any of the pleadings. And said.... that her two lawyers in the pleadings, or her lawyers who a 4 A: I’m not sure the request f filed the pleadings, pressured her into including my name ‘al i or the second call.... Th and details. = 3 like to talk to your wife [I Q: Did’Rebecca ever suggest to you that the details sworn to by g down. I’m happy to talk Virginia Roberts were false? SF that they would think — A: She certainly suggested that, yes. She mentioned to me that "7 her to think about it. An Virginia Roberts had never, ever mentioned [me to herl, 4 9 few days and find out wt among any of the people that she had had any contact with, 7 7 were. until she —until she was pressured into doing so by her law- 7 Q: Where were you when : yers, yes. : 4 when you made this phon Q: So from the very first conversation, the impression you had q _ A: I think I was in New York was that this was a witness who could provide information 4 q Q: Do you know whether tt that Bradley Edwards and Paul Cassell had acted unethically 4 phone or a landline? and dishonestly, correct? a A: I don’t remember. A: I wasn’t sure she could provide the information because she ‘ Q: Have you attempted to gat was very reluctant to come forw