Page |55 reciprocal control, characteristic of status and was associated with a lower reflex processes, where autonomic incidence of heart attack. Participants balance can be biased toward one or the who had low Cardiac Autonomic other of the autonomic branches. High Regulation were more likely to have scores indicate sympathetic dominance suffered from a heart attack. and low scores parasympathetic Could higher Cardiac Autonomic dominance. Independent estimates of Reoulation scores explain wh sympathetic and parasympathetic control él li P d oh i sk btained using standard spirituality was associated with less ris were © 8 for heart attack? That is, could a pattern measurement procedures, and the level ¢ ‘ lati ‘ : of parasympathetic control was of autonomic regulation associated with parasy , spirituality explain the link between subtracted from sympathetic control to irituali h 9 derive a measure of Cardiac Autonomic ines hear arta Tn order to Balance. A second metric was designed ‘stiesl q f th aa i to capture an alternative mode of statistical tests of these linkages. As we . . . already knew, both spiritualit autonomic control (Cardiac Autonomic Car Hon Birt vamic Re a ane Regulation) that assesses the degree of ‘ated with a 1 gue relative coactivation (rather than associated waih.a lower IeMlence OF . oo. heart attack. When the predictive effects reciprocal activation) of both branches. of spitituality were sta : ticall v This is a metric that taps into the non- ex oo ted. Cardiac Au ‘nomi reciprocal regulatory influences of lati ° ‘ i hioher neural structures. Cardiac Regu ation continued to be a significant ht c Reoulati ; predictor of a lower incidence of heart “etived by’ essentially ne attack. However, when the linkage test tiviti y f th y a fj - was reversed and the effects of Cardiac activites OF tie sympatiene an Autonomic Regulation were extracted, parasympathetic branches to afford a vrituali | a measure of total overall autonomic spe aa sy Weenie l