Page |31 ct years, new energy and fresh public ao) interest have been injected into this ey eli gi ous OO on _ conversation. This largely has come _ BO chiIGERy wom. IBD sete ETB paycholony Se" ; about due to the new insights into watt Tener Hem lo Viewsciénce religion and ethics achieved by cheetah hk An OS sleencl collaboration between evolutionary tedhurmanism sisi human sey Le sere | - RA SS"0 inclusive gol BA psychology and cognitive and social ak oo neuroscience. O What are the likely social Chapter 3° consequences of this new interest in the relation of science and religion? There . . . are at least three possible answers. One Science, Religion, and a. Revived might be the new atheism exemplified Religious Humanism by the writings of Richard Dawkins, Daniel Dennett, Sam Harris, and For over 150 years there has been Chri . 1 . . ; ristopher Hitchens. In this approach, a vital, and often contentious, dialogue . 4s ‘ . the alleged defective thinking of the between science and religion. In recent oe world religions is exposed, and a TT worldview and way of life based strictly ° The lead author is Don Browning, Ph.D., the on science are offered as replacement. A Alexander Campbell Professor of Religious second option might be the return of a Ethics and the Social Sciences, Emeritus, hesemernte dominanee of telicion aver Divinity School, University of Chicago. He has 8 _ 8 . interests in the relation of the social sciences to science. However, polarizing thetoric religious ethics for the purpose of addressing from advocates for the exclusive various challenges facing modern life. His books interpretive priority of either science or include Generative Man (1973, 1975; National religion has long since ceased to be Book Award Finalist, 1974), Religious Thought eulltmel|y ur seademtestte wracinotivs and the Modern Psychologies (1987, 2004), the Ut ° Y PLOOUCU Vee co-authored From Culture Wars to Common Instead, through dialogue about common Ground: Religion and the Ame