Page |10 2. that one need not agree with a from which they have not position to perform a deep and benefitted. The tensions reflect thorough analysis of the deep and enduring differences in arguments for and against the the way in which scholars in the position. Objectivity in thought humanities, the social sciences, and analysis are keys to reaching and the sciences think about a deep understanding of a topic. theory, methods, and evidence. By taking a position, developing These differences can test one’s arguments for and against the mettle but if acknowledged, position, then taking the opposite respected, embraced, and position and doing likewise, we pursued, they result in a richer, develop the capacity to be more more innovative and synergistic dispassionate and powerful collaborative effort. In the case thinkers — and gain deeper of our Network, this was neither insight into a topic. easy nor quick, but it was 3. that one need not reach achieved through a mutual agreement with someone to learn respect and exchange of ideas a great deal from discussions and a shared conviction with them or to make significant regarding the importance of the advances in addressing a Network’s combination of complex question. The salve of approaches from the humanities affirmation can lead us to seek and the sciences. In a sense, our like-minded others and to Network is a microcosm of the denigrate and avoid those who structure that exists in our disagree with us. Although this society. If these tensions are may provide temporary comfort, embraced and used to their full it does little to help address deep catapultic effect, one can make divisions or solve problems with progress on serious problems, which we must deal in an transforming not only how we increasingly complex and diverse think about the problem, but also world. There are inherent how we think about those who tensions between the sciences hold different or opposing views. and the humanities, and these 4. that the in