Page |9 synergistically to shed new light on the provocative story of the mind that is human mind? In the Fall of 2004, we emerging from the collective efforts of established an ongoing network of more the Network is the subject of this book. than a dozen scholars unbounded by The Network is unconventional disoiplinary precincts, geegraphical in other ways, as well. Traditionally borers, ot muthodelopioal perspectives scientists and scholars work together to te(set aside ant genisis that ad srown achieve a common understanding and a bp between scence ante HUMES m consensus position. We quickly learned order to explore this question. These that we did not need to come to a Network scholars hail from disciplines consensus to benefit tremendously ftom as «ligparale as psychology, neurology, the dialogue on the capacity and thedlogy, statistics, plulosophy, mn fecal motivation for the ubiquitous human medicine, anthropology, and sociology. quest for sociality and spirituality. For Een Grihest Sells was well farenin instance, there is no consensus within in thetr own field and were busy with the Network on whether there is a God, other obhgaitens, but ub was the and we do not seek here to provide the oppertunity to aehleve a deeper, mare final word on what science and the coMmprelensive discussion et the hosvan humanities each have to say to the other than it at imadle eee hie nae ta about the human mind. Instead, our inci egal re Pare OTe purpose is to illustrate the possibility and Network, importance of engaging others whose Although various members of the views we may not share in a serious Network interact on a daily or weekly dialogue on such topics. Among the basis, the entire Network convenes twice lessons we as a Network have learned annually for a four-day retreat to discuss are: each other’s research, to critique each L. that some questions about human other and to learn from one other. : nature and our social and Scientific analyses characterized by spiritua