192 about Snowden for Sony. Stone said that the million dollar deal with Kucherena effectively guaranteed that any competing project would not have access to Snowden. Sony consequently put the competing film on hold. To be sure, it is not unusual for a lawyer to negotiate a deal on behalf of a client, but a lawyer ordinarily does not have the power to block a competing film access to their client. Clearly, Kucherena was no ordinary lawyer. Among other positions, he was on the public board of the FSB security service. In light of such connections, Stone said Kucherena might be acting as an intermediary for other parties who did control access to Snowden in Russia but that were not his concern. Kucherena delivered the exclusive access to Snowden. Aside from being a skilled director, Stone is a shrewd producer who knew how to close a deal. He assessed, correctly as it turned out, that the payment to Kucherena would effectively block Sony’s competing project. Where the money went was far less clear. Towards the end of our dinner, Stone told me that he did not know I was writing a book about until a few weeks earlier. He learned of my book from Snowden. He said Snowden had expressed concern to him about the direction of the book I was writing. “What was it about?” Stone asked me. I was taken aback. I had no idea that Snowden was aware of my book project, as I had not tried to contact him. I told Stone that I considered Snowden to be extraordinary man who had changed history. Although I was intentionally vague in my description, Stone seemed to be reassured. That Snowden was aware that I was investigating him presented an opportunity. I asked Stone about the possibility of my seeing Snowden in Moscow. Stone did not offer to arrange such a meeting. He said only that I “might want to speak to Anatoly [Kucherena].” This conversation suggested to me that Kucherena was Snowden’s gate- keeper. In his two years in Moscow, Snowden, or his handlers, had granted only a hand