| ® || The Keys to the Kingdom Are Missing | 177 tions. When they discussed Snowden’s legal situation in America, Snowden expressed an interest in obtaining some form of amnesty from prosecution. Wizner was willing to attempt to explore making a possible deal with the Department of Justice, but it would not be an easy task, especially if Snowden had turned over NSA documents to a foreign power. Even to argue that Snowden was merely an NSA whistle-blower presented a serious challenge for Wizner. The ACLU had been involved with previous NSA whistle-blowers, but Snowden’s case differed from those cases in important ways. Those whistle-blowers had not intentionally taken any NSA documents. Snowden, on the other hand, had not only taken a large number of NSA documents but also released tens of thousands of these top secret files to jour- nalists based in Germany and Brazil, as well as to other unauthor- ized recipients. In addition, the Whistleblower Protection Act, passed by Congress in 1989, does not exempt an insider, such as Snowden, who signs a secrecy oath from the legal consequences of disclos- ing classified documents to journalists or other unauthorized people. © Consequently, getting some form of amnesty for Snowden required re) bolstering his image as a person taking personal risks to fight for America. But if Snowden had taken even a single top secret docu- ment to Russia, it would strengthen the case in the court of public opinion that he had stolen communications intelligence secrets with the intent to damage the United States, which under the provisions of federal law could be considered espionage. In this regard, Kucher- ena’s disclosure was extremely damaging to Snowden’s position, and Snowden had, after all, already found refuge in Russia. Snowden had two options, according to Wizner, the “first is to be where he is in Russia. And the second is to be in a maximum security prison cell, cut off from the world.” These, of course, would be the opt