4/8/2019 Case 1:19-cv-0337 7PrabdBerenever al del Hour aReay TG 1v-PAge 3 of 4 The fact that he was giving money didn’t hurt. We went to events that he was involved in but none of us suspected that he had another side until later. Jeffrey loved academics. My conversations with him were only about academic subjects. We never discussed females or our social life. Did your relationship change with Epstein when you took him on as a client? Virtually all my social contact with him was of an academic nature, and it was prior to the time he was indicted. My relationship with him was entirely professional. It is a total bum rap to say that | “cavorted” with him or was “chummy” with him. | teach my students never, never get too close to clients—and certainly don’t do anything improper with them. The suit says that Jane Doe No. 3 was forced to have sex with you, Prince Andrew and “many other powerful men,” including unnamed politicians, foreign presidents and world leaders. Why were you and the Prince singled out by name? They want to void the plea agreement and needed to find a lawyer who knew Epstein before [the indictment], and had been on his island, his home in New Mexico, Palm Beach. | fit the bill. It was lawyer profiling. And the Prince? They claimed that Prince Andrew was using his influence to get Epstein a better deal with the government. What's more laughable than suggesting that the U.S. Attorney would listen to the Prince to go easy on Epstein! Why bother responding if you think the allegations are so outrageous? Why not just let the facts come out during the legal process? | have to respond to everything. That’s the way | am. Imagine having an unblemished personal life then reading graffiti scrawled on the bathroom door that gets picked up in every paper based on the assertions of a woman who’s a serial liar. Brad Edwards, one of the lawyers bringing this suit, has a history of legal entanglement with Epstein, as does his former partner Sc