In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 392 F.Supp.2d 539 (2005) 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789 Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73, 104 S.Ct. criminal provisions define “material support or resources” 2229, 81 L.Ed.2d 59 (1984) (“A court may dismiss a as “currency or other financial securities, financial complaint only if it is clear that no relief could be granted services, lodging, training, safehouses, false under any set of facts that could be proved consistent with documentation or identification, | communications the allegations.”). equipment, facilities, weapons, lethal explosives, personnel, transportation, and other physical assets, Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires “a short except medicine or religious materials.” 18 U.S.C. § and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader 2339A(b); see also Boim IT, 291 F.3d at 1015 (finding is entitled to relief.” “This simplified notice pleading conduct that violates § 2339A would be sufficient to meet standard relies on liberal discovery rules and summary the definition of “international terrorism” in § 2333). This judgment motions to define disputed facts and issues and Court adopts the Seventh Circuit’s requirement that to dispose of unmeritorious claims.” Swierkiewicz vy. Plaintiffs plead that Defendants knew of al Qaeda’s illegal Sorema, N.A., 534 U.S. 506, 512, 122 S.Ct. 992, 152 activities, “that they desired to help those activities L.Ed.2d 1 (2002) (citing Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, succeed, and they engaged in some act of helping the 47, 78 S.Ct. 99, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957), Leatherman vy. illegal activities.” Jd. at 1023-24 (finding allegation that Tarrant County Narcotics Intelligence & Coordination defendants are “ ‘front’ organizations with ostensibly Unit, 507 U.S. 163, 168-69, 113 S.Ct. 1160, 122 L.Ed.2d legitimate purposes which are actually engaged in *565 517 (1993)). Plaintiffs must still give Defendants fair and fund-raising and money laundering in support of terrorist