In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 392 F.Supp.2d 539 (2005) 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789 purposefully directed his activities toward the United States by making personal contributions to several Saudi-based charities. (Federal Compl. JJ 442-43.) *360 B. Rabita Trust’ 2°] Plaintiffs allege that Rabita Trust is 191 Plaintiffs must make a prima facie showing that Prince Salman and Prince Naif have minimum contacts with the United States. The minimum contacts requirement is . ar . : ect . . se a charitable organization which was satisfied “if the defendant has ‘purposefully directed’ his . _. aa . a : created to organize the repatriation activities at the residents of the forum.” Burger King v. and rehabilitation of stranded Rudzewicz, 471 U.S. 462, 474, 105 S.Ct. 2174, 85 Pakistanis from Bangladesh L.Ed.2d 528 (1985). Foreseeability is not enough, there . 8 ; : : Founded in 1988, the trust fund must be “some act by which the defendant purposefully . a . : ae wa: was started jointly by the avails itself of the privilege of conducting activities within . 9 . . government of Pakistan and the the forum.” Jd Donating money to established . ; ae _ Saudi-based charity, [Defendant humanitarian organizations that may or may not have . . ar MWL]. Rabita Trust received the been diverting funds to support al Qaeda cannot be Lo . . . : ee . . . majority of its funding from the considered primary participation in intentional . : . . MWL and the Saudis, and [has] wrongdoing expressly aimed at the United States. been involved with terrorism Terrorist Attacks I, 349 F.Supp.2d at 809 (citing In re , Magnetic Audiotape Antitrust Litig., 334 F.3d 204, 208 (2d Cir.2003)). (Ashton Compl. § 521; Burnett Compl. J 268.) The As to Prince Salman’s various limited contacts with the charity initially received funding from its founders to help United States, they do not support general jurisdiction relocate 250,000 displaced refugees. (Ashton Compl. J over him. The 1989 visit to the White Hous