In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 392 F.Supp.2d 539 (2005) 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789 actionable under the FSIA. Varig Airlines, 467 U.S. at of Civil Procedure 12(b)(2), Plaintiffs must make a prima 814, 104 S.Ct. 2755. facie showing that personal jurisdiction exists over each moving Defendant. PDK Labs, Inc. v. Friedlander, 103 Similarly, the claims against Prince Naif stem from his F.3d 1105, 1108 (2d Cir.1997). The Court reviews the discretionary functions. The Plaintiffs complain that complaints and affidavits in a light most favorable to Prince Naif, as Minister of Interior, ignored warnings in Plaintiffs, id. but it does not accept conclusory 1994 from French Interior Minister Charles Pasqua that allegations or draw “argumentative inferences.” Mende v. Islamic charities were being used to fund terrorism. Milestone Tech., Inc., 269 F.Supp.2d 246, 251 Additionally, Plaintiffs contend that he did not adequately (S.D.N.Y.2003) (citing Robinson v. Overseas Military supervise certain Saudi charities whose diverted funds Sales Corp., 21 F.3d 502, 507 (2d Cir.1994)). allegedly landed in the coffers of al Qaeda and Hamas. 131 Plaintiffs offer two bases for personal jurisdiction. Prince Naif’s role on the Council of Ministers and as First, New York’s long-arm statute, which the Court looks Minister of Interior makes it “nearly self-evident” that his to in federal question cases in which no federal statute official acts are “squarely covered by the ‘discretionary provides for national service of process or when the Court function’ language of [the FSIA].” Burnett IT, 292 is sitting in diversity. PDK Labs, 103 F.3d at 1108; Bank F.Supp.2d at 20. As the Minister of Interior, Prince Naif Brussels Lambert v. Fiddler Gonzalez & Rodriguez, 305 oversees matters relating to Saudi public security, civil F.3d 120, 124 (2d Cir.2002). *557 New York’s long-arm defense, fire service, police, passports, special security, statute, C.P.L.R. 302(a)(2), provides for personal and in