In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 392 F.Supp.2d 539 (2005) 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789 government. (/d. J 6.) He also states that the Kingdom of Dr. Al-Nafissa states that private charities in the Saudi Arabia is represented by SHC when it makes Kingdom of Saudi Arabia receive governmental approval donations to Bosnia—Herzegovina. (/d.) through Royal Order, are run by boards, and disburse *552 funds in accordance with their charters. (Al-Nafissa (61 There is no dispute that SHC is a separate legal person Decl. § 5.) In contrast, governmental commissions, such from the Kingdom and not a citizen of the United States as SHC, are chaired by a governmental official, like or any third country. See 28 U.S.C. § 1603. Accordingly, Prince Salman, and conduct their affairs in accordance the only dispute regarding SHC’s status is whether it is an with the Kingdom’s policy objectives. Ud. § 5.) organ of the Kingdom. In Filler v. Hanvit Bank, 378 F.3d According to Dr. Al-Nafissa, “[d]ecisions regarding 213 (2d Cir.2004), the Second Circuit considered various causes to support and recipients for Saudi High factors to determine whether an entity could be Commission funds are within the discretion of the considered an organ of a foreign sovereign. Jd. at 217. Executive Committee, the Supreme Commission, and The factors include: Prince Salman.” (/d. § 8.) The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia is SHC’s largest source of funding, having provided approximately 30% of the funds used and distributed by . SHC. (Al-Roshood Decl. ¥ 24.) The remainder of SHC (1) whether the foreign State funds are collected through fundraisers “in accordance created the entity for a national with the directives of ... King Fahd.” Ud. 9 5.) SHC can be PULROSSE (2) whether the foreign sued for its administrative acts in the Board of state actively supervises the entity Grievances. (Al-Nafissa Decl. § 8.) G3) Whether the foreign state requires the hiring of public In their complaint, the Federal Plaintiffs alleg