In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 392 F.Supp.2d 539 (2005) 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789 455, 463; see also Federal RICO Statement Applicable to Mem. in Opp’n to Prince Naif’s Mot. at 2-3, 5.) Saudi Princes at Ex. A.) The Federal Plaintiffs claim Prince Salman “fully intended [SHC] would serve as a Plaintiffs claim that “Prince Naif has engaged in a pattern vehicle for funding and supporting Islamic militants in of conduct that aids, abets, and materially sponsors Bosnia, including elements of the al Qaida movement.” international terrorism and Al Qaeda.” (Ashton Compl. Jf (Federal Compl. J 456.) “Prince Salman knowingly failed 288, 255; Burnett Compl. Jf 342, 381; Federal Compl. J to take appropriate actions regarding the management and 434; see also Federal RICO Statement Applicable to use of funds of the SHC in Bosnia.” (Ashton Compl. J Saudi Princes at Ex. A.) They claim that along with other 457; Burnett Compl. § 406.) On December 30, 2000, the Saudi princes, Prince *550 Naif made “monetary payoffs Embassy of the State of Palestine in Riyadh sent Prince to Osama bin Laden’s al Qaeda.” (Ashton Compl. § 288; Salman a letter expressing Yasser Arafat’s concern Burnett Compl. § 381.) “In 1996, according to various regarding the funding of radical organizations in intelligence sources, a group of Saudi princes ... met in Palestine. (Ashton Compl. 9 291; Burnett Compl. § 402.) Paris and agreed to continue contributing, sponsoring, Further, Plaintiffs claim Prince Salman “has a history of aiding and abetting Osama bin Laden’s terrorist network.” funding Islamic extremism,” because he was named the (Burnett Compl. | 347.) Plaintiffs claim that Prince Naif Chairman of the General Donation Committee for and the Saudi government received warnings from the Afghanistan in 1980, which gave $39 million to aid the United States and France that charitable donations to Afghan mujahideen. (Ashton Compl. § 289; Burnett Islamic charities were being used to fund terrorism. (See