In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 392 F.Supp.2d 539 (2005) 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789 internationally for terrorist purposes was injustice. sufficient to state a claim under Antiterrorism Act (ATA), in action alleging provision of ; ; support for September 11th attacks. 18 U.S.C.A. Cases that cite this headnote § 2339(A). 2 Cases that cite this headnote 46] International Law Proceedings to determine immunity On reconsideration of prior order, District Court (431 _- Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt would postpone further inquiry into bank’s Organizations status as a foreign sovereign, for purposes of its Association or participation assertion that it was entitled to immunity, under Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), in Absent any allegation that defendant action alleging it provided support for terrorists participated in the operation or management of involved in September 11th attacks, until alleged terrorist enterprise, allegation that he completion of personal jurisdiction discovery; controlled several bank accounts and transmitted personal jurisdiction issue was more money internationally for terrorist purposes straightforward and Court was hesitant to failed to state a claim under Racketeer subject Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to discovery. Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act 28 U.S.C.A. § 1602 et seq. (RICO), for purposes of action alleging provision of support for terrorists involved in 3 Cases that cite this headnote September 11th attacks. 18 U.S.C.A. § 1961 et seq. 1 Cases that cite this headnote Attorneys and Law Firms *345 Andrew J. Maloney, II, Blanca I. Rodriguez, Brian [44] Federal Civil Procedure J. Alexander, *546 David Beekman, David C. Cook, @Error by court Francis G. Fleming, James P. Kreindler, Justin Timothy Green, Lee S. Kreindler, Marc S. Moller, Milton G. A motion for reconsideration is appropriate Sincoff, Noah H. Kushlefsky, Paul S. Edelman, Robert where a court overlooks controlling decisions or James Spragg, Steven R. Pounia