In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 392 F.Supp.2d 539 (2005) 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789 Civ.Proc.Rules 4(k)(2), 12(b)(2), 28 U.S.C.A. 201“ Federal Civil Procedure @ Jurisdictional discovery Federal Courts 2 Cases that cite this headnote @Dismissal or other disposition District Court would deny without prejudice purported Islamic charitable trust’s motion to 138 co. dismiss, for lack of personal jurisdiction, Constitutional Law : complaint in action alleging provision of support Non profit, charitable, and educational for terrorists involved in September 11th attacks, orgenizablens pending further jurisdictional discovery as to Federal Courts whether trust’s activities were directed at the Seeman United States; U.S. Government had designated o Co a the trust a Specially Designated Global Terrorist District Court had personal jurisdiction, under Entity. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 12(b)(2), 28 rule establishing personal jurisdiction for cases USCA. arising under federal law where defendant had sufficient contacts with the United States as a whole but was not subject to jurisdiction in any 1 Cases that cite this headnote particular state, over purported Islamic relief organization, for purposes of action alleging provision of support for terrorists involved in September 11th attacks; organization purposefully directed its activities at the U.S., 21] Federal Civil Procedure satisfying due process minimum contacts Jurisdictional discovery requirement, inasmuch as it operated in the U.S. and was involved in supporting attacks and Courts enjoy great discretion in deciding activities of the terrorist organization. U.S.C.A. whether to order jurisdictional discovery before Const.Amend. 5; Fed.Rules Civ.Proc.Rules resolving motions to dismiss for lack of personal 4(k)(2), 12(b)(2), 28 U.S.C.A. jurisdiction. Fed.Rules Civ.Proc.Rule 12(b)(2), 28 US.C.A, Cases that cite this headnote 1 Cases that cite this headnote Pal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations 22] ‘Federal