In re Terrorist Attacks on September 11, 2001, 392 F.Supp.2d 539 (2005) 10 A.L.R. Fed. 2d 789 @ Matters considered in general Article stating that Islamic aid organizations in 16] International Law Afghanistan, Bosnia, Somalia, and Tajikistan @ Corporations and other instrumentalities provided funds and cover to terrorists would not be admitted to supplement record on motion to Saudi High Commission (SHC) made prima dismiss in action, arising out of the September facie showing it was entitled to immunity, under 11 terrorist attacks, alleging that two Saudi Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (FSIA), in officials involved with Islamic charities were action alleging it had provided funding for knowingly providing funding for terrorists; terrorists; SHC was created by the Council of plaintiffs failed to explain why they were only Ministers of Kingdom of Saudi Arabia to able to obtain and translate the article on eve of provide Kingdom’s aid to Bosnia and was oral argument, article and its translation were governed by a Saudi official, its employees were not authenticated, and article did not say Saudi civil servants, and it could be sued in the officials were put on notice regarding specific Kingdom’s administrative court like other Saudi charities or that they continued to contribute to government agencies, and SHC made no explicit those charities with intent that donations would waiver of its sovereign immunity inasmuch as assist terrorists. any contrary representations by SHC were made prior to the action. 28 U.S.C.A. § 1602 et seq. Cases that cite this headnote Cases that cite this headnote i International Law 7] International Law «Extent and effect of immunity @ Extent and effect of immunity Immunity under Foreign Sovereign Immunities To extent that complaint, in action alleging Act (FSIA) extends to agents of a foreign state support for terrorist organizations, alleged that acting in their official capacities, inasmuch as a two Saudi officials provided such support