IN RE TERRORIST ATTACKS ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 833 Cite as 349 F.Supp.2d 765 (S.D.N.Y. 2005) with the opportunity to clarify their claims attacks of September 11. Even accepting against Al Rajhi Bank, the Burnett Plain- all the allegations against Al Rajhi Bank as tiffs do not offer facts to support their true, Plaintiffs have failed to state a claim conclusions that Al Rajhi Bank had to that would entitle them to relief. Accord- know that Defendant charities WAMY, ingly, Al Rajhi Bank’s motion to dismiss MWL, IIRC, and SJRC were supporting the Burnett complaint is granted in its terrorism. See Rule 12(e) Statement entirety. 11 44-60. “[A] complaint which consists of conclusory allegations unsupported by fac- 2. Saudi American Bank tual assertions fails even on the liberal [96] Saudi American Bank is based in standard of Rule 12(b)(6).” De Jesus v. Rihadh, Saudi Arabia and was formed in Sears, Roebuck & Co., 87 F.3d 65, 70 (2d 1980 pursuant to a royal decree to take Cir.1996). over the then-existing branches of Citi- This Court, like Judge Robertson before bank in Riyadh and Jeddah. Ashton Com- it, has found no basis for a bank’s liability Plaint 1603; Burnett Complaint 1140. It for injuries funded by money passing is the second largest bank in Saudi Arabia through it on routine banking business. 2nd has offices in the United States, based See Burnett I, 274 F.Supp.2d at 109. Sim- in New York. Ashton Complaint 1 604; ilarly, allegations concerning the Al Rajhi Burnett Complaint 9141-42, Its chair- family cannot support a claim against Al man, Abdullahziz Bin Hamad Al Gosaibi is Rajhi Bank because there is no allegation also the Chairman of the Saudi Cement that the family members were acting in Company in Damman, Saudi Arabia. Ash- furtherance of Al Rajhi Bank business. 10” Complaint 1605; Burnett Complaint Tasso v. Platinum Guild Intl, 94 Civ. 1142." Ahmed Ali Jumale, purportedly a 8288(LAP), 1997 WL 16066, at *6 close associate of Osama bin Laden and (S.D.N.Y. Jan