secondary sources. Because Adolf Hitler is only one of many names, the list as a whole nevertheless exhibits strong evidence of suppression, especially because the measure we retained (median usage) is robust to such outliers. 3) Degenerate artists The list of degenerate artists was taken directly from the catalog of a recent exhibition at the Los Angeles County Museum of Art which endeavored to reconstruct the original ‘Degenerate Art’ exhibition (Ref $15). 4) People with recorded ties to Nazis The list of Nazi party members was generated in a manner consistent with the occupation categories in section 7. We included the following Wikipedia categories: Nazis_from_outside_Germany, Nazi_leaders, SS_officers, _Holocaust_perpetrators, Officials_of_Nazi_Germany, Nazis_convicted_of_war_crimes, together with all of their subcategories, with the exception of Nazis_from_outside_Germany. In addition, the three categories German_Nazi_politicians, Nazi_physicians, Nazis were included without their respective subcategories. III.9B. De Novo Identification of Censored and Suppressed Individuals We began with the list of 56,500 people, comprising the 500 most famous individuals born in each year from 1800 — 1913. This list was derived from the analysis of all biographies in Wikipedia described in section 7. We removed all individuals whose mean frequency in the German language corpus was less than 5x 10° during the period from 1925 — 1933; because their frequency is low, a statistical assessment of the effect of censorship and suppression on these individuals is more susceptible to noise. The suppression index is computed for the remaining individuals using an observed/expected measure. The expected fame for a given year is computed by taking the mean frequency of the individual in the German language from 1925-1933, and the mean frequency of the individual from 1955-1965. These two values are assigned to 1929 and 1960, respectively; linear interpolation is then performed in ord