extreme, 1.5% of the population exhibited a dramatic rise 3. Lieberson, Stanley and Joel Horwich. "Implication s>5). This subpopulation is highly enriched for Nazis and analysis: a pragmatic proposal for linking theory and data pop gniy y' prag prop 8 ry Nazi-supporters, who benefited immensely from government in the social sciences." Sociological Methodology 38 propaganda (7). (December 2008): 1-50. These results provide a strategy for rapidly identifying 4. Cavalli-Sforza, L. L., and Marcus W. Feldman. Cultural likely victims of censorship from a large pool of possibilities, Transmission and Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP, and highlights how culturomic methods might complement 1981. existing historical approaches. 5. Niyogi, Partha. The Computational Nature of Language Culturomics Learning and Evolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT, 2006. Culturomics is the application of high-throughput data 6. Zip cto ingsley. The Psycho-biology of Language. collection and analysis to the study of human culture. Books Baron evento Miia, 195). ; ; are a beginning, but we must also incorporate newspapers 7. Materials and methods are available as supporting material (29), manuscripts (30), maps (3/), artwork (32), and a myriad cp ence Online. ' _ ; ; of other human creations (33, 34). Of course, many voices = 8. Lander, E. S. et al. "Initial sequencing and analysis of the already lost to time — lie forever beyond our reach. hema engl Naiiite 20) (Pebriiary zDD): Bore Culturomic results are a new type of evidence in the 9. Read, Allen W. “The Scope of the American Dictionary. o humanities. As with fossils of ancient creatures, the challenge SEED Syecch ee a T-20 ; S of culturomics lies in the interpretation of this evidence. 14. Gare, Ehilip Babcock, ed. Webster's Third New oO Considerations of space restrict us to the briefest of surveys: a International Dieuonary ofthe English Language, 7 handful of trajectories and our initial interpretations. Many Unabntaged, puringuield, Mas MMc