Cullen/Frost Bankers Inc (CFR) To arrive at our $74 price objective, we employed a three-factor valuation methodology that incorporates target P/E, target P/TBV and a DCF model. For our P/E valuation, we apply a 15x earnings multiple on CFR's 2017E core earnings. For our P/TBV valuation, we apply a 1.7x tangible book multiple to CFR'’s 2017E tangible book. Both multiples are lower than peers for CFR due to EPS headwinds and rising credit costs from lower energy prices. For our DCF analysis, we use a net income growth of 3.0% and assume a beta of 1.0 in the terminal stage. Upside risks to our PO: a sharp rebound in oil prices, higher than expected interest rates, stronger loan growth, better than expected credit performance of CFR's energy loan portfolio. Downside risks: A worse than expected decline in Texas economic growth that impacts CFR's balance sheet growth, a slower than expected pace or rate hikes and a worse than expected sell off in oil prices. East West Bancorp, Incorporated (EWBC) Our three-pronged valuation methodology (target P/E, target P/TBV, and DCF analysis} drives our price objective of $50. We assumes a 16.0x P/ 2017e EPS and a target P/TBV of 2.0x to 2Q17E tangible book given our forecast above peer EPS growth. Our DCF assumes a two-stage cost of capital of 9.5% and a terminal growth rate of 3% Upside risks to our PO are a quick economic recovery (led by stabilization or appreciation in CA housing values) or a faster than expected recovery in China. Downside risk to our PO is an even deeper economic slowdown driving corporate losses higher than we currently anticipate, faster than expected normalization in credit. Eaton Vance (EV) Our $35 price objective is based on a target P/E of 15x calendar 2016E (14x '17E), at a discount to our asset-manager group target multiple, given recent outflows from high fee products, offset by distinct products in areas such as floating rate and overlay. Downside risks to our price objective are market depreciation