experienced, seek and think | know about, Thom was not after the logical proofs of geometry but rather viewed mathematical theorem and proof work as activity derived from intuitive experience with geometric relations as the thought forms that represented real Reality. Though a Field’s Medal winner in mathematics (recall that it is the Nobel Prize in mathematics awarded every four years at the International Congress of Mathematics) and for his life time, one of the most brilliant and fecund mathematicians in the world, so many mathematicians admit that they got the seeds of their life work from his throw away remarks, Thom, with a little smile and his eyes twinkling, admitted to me with apparent pleasure that “| have never proven any theorem in my life.” All his discoveries came from insightful moments of grace and the courage to pursue them. Riding back from Paris late one night on a train that didn’t stop at /HES’s town of Bures sur Yvette, | watched him use the red emergency phone to call the train’s engineer to stop the train suddenly for our exit. | loved him, in part, because he had the courage to believe in and act on my kind of intuitively realizable, experiential God. In keeping with his characteristic style of generalizing mathematical systems beyond their carefully defined specifics, Thom defined the concept of singularity very broadly, speaking of them as distinctive and noteworthy things, points where the usual or expected properties, laws and definitions fail, where smooth and continuous processes become discontinuous. For Thom, these were the settings for the unexpected and miraculous. He believed that his work and that of many others, now and in the future, would indicate that the set of miraculous singularities were finite, systematic, universal and describable. Most importantly for our purposes, Thom believed them to be archetypal. It was through the structure of archetypal singularities that he regarded inside and outside realities as mutually ref