neuropsychological causality, and inhibitory on or off and activating on or off are a priori functionally equivalent with respect to the logic gates of information encoding, transport or storage, the modern study of brain mechanisms in emotion, cognition and behavior remains almost as mysterious as ever. The only human mind-brain observations that are doubted consistently, and treated as unpublishable by the editors of the journals of science, are those that result from direct human experience using subjective reports from within. They are called unscientific. Often ignored are logically consistent mathematical and computational contexts, which, as abstract and general tools of thinking and imagining, have the capacity to frame, rigorously define and describe thinking about both the subjective and objective aspects of brain-generated phenomena. These mathematically configured metaphors can lead to consistencies in description, this is behaving like that, in what are called equivalence relations expressed both as intuitive imagery; for a concrete example, a one holed bagel and one handled tea cup are topologically equivalent because, sculpting in clay, they can be smoothly transformed into each other. We have seen that invariant measures in computable statistical flows can come out of a mess of data. Professor Paul Rapp of the University of Pennsylvania has been able to mathematically encode the verbal content of the patient’s free associations and the therapist's responses, using tape recordings of hours of psychoanalytical treatment. Examples of quantifiable qualities found useful in this regard involve a variety of characteristic statistical patterns in what are called entropies and information as well as various measures of what with a wide range of definitions is called complexity. These quantifiable properties, measures, can help in the struggle with the intrinsic tension of Absolute Reality between the “eternal emptiness of form and the eternal form of emptin