122 H3vlgiu2 1 MS. McCAWLEY: Whether she knew about it. That's not 2 for the truth of the matter, your Honor. That's what she knew 3 at the time, right, she made the statement, did she know about 4 all these individuals in the police report, did she know about 5 this. So that can be offered not for the truth but to show 6 whether she knew about it. Whether she knew that at the time 7 she was making that statement, it was false, because not only 8 did my client get abused there but so many other girls as well. 9 So, your Honor, that's part of it. And in your order, 10 in your June 20th order, you said -- Pi. THE COURT: Excuse me. 1 MS. McCAWLEY: Sure. 13 THE COURT: You say the detective authenticated these 14 documents. He didn't authenticate them in the sense of saying 15 that these are part of the file. I mean, it's not that kind of 16 an authentication. de MS. McCAWLEY: It is, your Honor. There are two 18 different things, and I'm jumping around a little bit, so 19 that's my fault. I'm sorry. But there are a series of 20 questions -- and I believe it's in our brief but it's also in 21 our designations -- where we walked through with him how he 22 conducted the investigation, how he recorded the information of 23 these witnesses, the interviews of the witnesses, the fact that 24 they were reported in this document, etc., in his testimony. 25 So that's one piece. And that's why this could come in under SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011425