Act 6 H3vlgiu2 ih As you've heard, the chain of custody behind these things after 2 2006 is a little sketchy. And, you know, it requires some 3 effort. And so, you know, ordinary folks I don't believe are 4 going to be, you know, rooting around trying to ferret out 5 police reports from South Florida. Even if you get them, they 6 are heavily redacted, and so when one looks at them, it's 7 virtually impossible to tell who's at issue, who's saying what 8 about whom, because there are lots of blackouts through these 9 police reports. We managed somehow -- and frankly, I don't 10 even know how -- to get an unredacted copy, and Detective 1a Recarey was surprised when he saw the unredacted copy because 12 he said, we always redact these things. And so I'm unclear as 13 to how ours is unredacted, but in any event, there is one out 14 there. But I don't know how we got it. 15 The other point on this, your Honor, is, again, there 16 is some liberty taken in the plaintiff's papers about what de Ms. Maxwell said or didn't say in her deposition about these 18 police reports, and they try to make hay over, she knew about 19 the police reports by the selective presentation of that 20 deposition testimony. And I've cited the actual quote for you 21 in the reply brief, but what is notable, in my view, is that 22 when Ms. Maxwell is presented with these police reports, it is 23 for the first time at her deposition by Ms. McCawley, and there 24 is an exchange in the transcript where Ms. McCawley and 25 Ms. Maxwell are going back and forth and Ms. Maxwell says, you SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011419