101 H3vlgiu2 ih MR. CASSELL: All right. Well, we thought, when we 2 filed our response, they continued to oppose it. If they had 3 just stipulated, you know, I wouldn't be taking your Honor's 4 Came. 5 But this is where I think they're taking a narrow 6 uncontested principle, that her net worth doesn't come in, and 7 are going to try to use it to exclude evidence that Ms. Maxwell 8 is making payments to the girls, that this mansion is a very -- 9 THE COURT: Well, okay. I don't think so. 10 MR. CASSELL: Let me just make sure that I have on the 1a table the things that we want to introduce. 12 For example, Mr. Epstein purchased a helicopter for 13 Ms. Maxwell, and they might say, oh, well, that shows financial 14 status or something. We think that shows a very close 15 connection. 16 Well, the last one and perhaps the most controversial uy one in connection with this case is the townhouse. It is our 18 beltefl that. a -- igs) THE COURT: Well, wait a minute. What's the basis of 20 your belief? 21 MR. CASSELL: The basis for our belief is, I believe 22 they've conceded that there was a sale of a $17 million 23 townhouse in 2016. 24 THE COURT: Okay. Is it the defendant's townhouse? 25 MR. CASSELL: Yes. So the question is -- SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011404