98 H3vlgiu2 ih MS. SCHULTZ: So it goes to a material argument that 2 defendants have advanced. 3 THE COURT: So to the extent that becomes an issue, 4 and that's a whole other thing, as to whether she intended the 5 statement, I can see that. 6 Okay. All right. Anything else? 7 MS. SCHULTZ: Yes. I'm just going to say that this is 8 a motion in limine and there are no evidentiary problems with 9 this piece of evidence. This is the defendant herself on 10 camera, this is not hearsay, and there's no Federal Rule of Pi. Evidence that should exclude this. 12 THE COURT: Okay. Do you want to add anything? 13 MS. MENNINGER: No, thank you, your Honor. 14 THE COURT: Okay. Thank you. 15 What else? 16 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, we can take up the de bifurcation issue that's presented in 662 and 766, and then 18 there was a reply filed last evening. 19 THE ‘COURT: Yes. 20 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I think -- well, I don't 21 think. The law is very clear on this issue in this circuit. 22 THErEe LS ai -— 23 THE COURT: Well, I think we can shorthand this. 24 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes« 25 THE COURT: Yes, yes. Maxwell's money doesn't come in SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011401