85 H3VOGIU1 1 X, fair enough, cross examine her about it, inconsistent 2 statement. We're not objecting to that aspect of that. 3 What we don't want is the lawsuit itself and the 4 circumstances surrounding the lawsuit to be paraded in front of 5 jury. If they simply want to put in a deposition statement to 6 stay it's inconsistent, and that's properly done, of course, 7 that would be appropriate. 8 Their second point is, she participated for a period 9 of time. I guess she participated if you're subpoenaed as a 10 witness and testified, but that wasn't -- you know, she wasn't 1a a party to the case. 12 Their third point was that the reputational damages 13 somehow link into what Dershowitz was saying. Again, your 14 Honor already knows our point one is to keep out Mr. Dershowitz 15 from the case, and you'll make a ruling one way or the other on 16 it. If he's kept out of the case then this becomes a moot de point. But even if you decide he's in the case, well, okay, 18 fine. Have him testify and do whatever else you think is 19 appropriate. We don't need to hear all about this unrelated 20 lawsuit. 21 Their fourth point had to do with, I believe, you 22 know, damages suffered by Ms. Giuffre. Your question was, if 23 I'm -- I don't have the transcript in front of me -- I think 24 you said, well, how does the case itself go to damages? And I 25 believe this is a direct quote from Ms. Menninger. "I can't SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011388