80 H3VOGIU1 ih prescribed over a period of time, and you'll understand that 2 this is not a situation of someone being a drugee and doctor 3 shopping, something that's in the news a lot these days. So 4 trying to submit it that way is not only irrelevant to this 5 case, but the prejudice greatly outweighs whatever probative 6 value it might be. Ms. Giuffre would not, of course, object to 7 testifying with regard to what current medication she takes, 8 but that's a different subject altogether. 9 With regard to criminal history, as I mentioned, 10 Ms. Giuffre denied that she stole the money. She said her 1a boyfriend took the money while he was there with her. And 1 defense counsel reminded Court that this victim is a thief. 13 Again, none of this information comes in under the Federal 14 Rules of Evidence. Even the charging document and the warrant 15 are classic hearsay and should be excluded. 16 With regard to the next one, I'm going to skip ahead uy to school records. The records don't show that she was in 18 school, as much as defendant seems to think she is. They don't 19 have also what days she attended and what days she doesn't. It 20 doesn't say that she was there on, for example, May 23rd, 2000. 21 What they do show is that there are no courses taken between 22 1999 and the 2000 school year, and no courses taken during the 23 2000 to 2001 school years. 24 Ms. Giuffer's attempt to work and resume school at 25 another school as as a tenth grader in the 2001 to 2002 school SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011383