33 H3VOGIU1 ih might be admitted at trial. Both are orders resolving 2 discovery disputes under Rule 26. 3 Apart from her medical records, while defendant was 4 abusing her, such as when defendant took her to a hospital here 5 in New York when she was only 17, and the psychological records 6 related to Ms. Giuffre, which have been produced, which 7 incidentally are from 2011 and name defendant as her abuser, no 8 other medical records are relevant and should be excluded under 9 Rule 401. 10 Ms. Giuffre is seeking damages for emotional distress 1a from defamation. It does not open up the flood gates to every 12 single medical issue she's ever had in her life. Ms. Giuffre 13 has produced records, everything from treatment for a ferret 14 bite to details of her giving birth. These are not relevant, 15 and we can have a ruling in advance of trial that these things 16 should be excluded. de Defendant only seeks to use these records to confuse 18 the issues before the jury. Defendant offers no reason for 19 addressing the relevance of such documents one by one at trial, 20 and I think these can be safely excluded at this juncture. 21 MS. McCAWLEY: Your Honor, next is number 17, which we 22 addressed in our papers, as well, about the prior settlement 23 agreement. You've heard about it in this case, and we have 24 said that that should not come into evidence. 25 I think they'd like to use it to propose that that SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011336