23 H3VOGIU1 ih which has been produced in discovery and submitted to this 2 Court, shows that it was defendant who sent her to Thailand, 3 sending her with handwritten instructions about what to do when 4 she gets there. So if this unsupported argument that defendant 5 left the United States because of some accusation of a tip jar 6 is to be believed, then that makes defendant an accessory after 7 the fact and implicates her in the wrongdoing. 8 So I don't -- basically, there's just -- this argument 9 is also undone by the fact that later, Ms. Giuffre comes back 10 to the United States to live here. She's not fleeing 1a accusations, she was fleeing defendant. If she were worried 12 about criminal liability in the United States, she wouldn't 13 come back to live here. 14 But the overall point is any marginal probative value 15 from these allegations, which I don't think there is any, but 16 it's far vastly outweighed by the prejudice it would cause uy Ms. Giuffre and should be excluded under all those rules. 18 Moving now to point 10. Ms. Giuffre has requested 19 that the Court exclude any evidence regarding special 20 schooling, truancy, and juvenile delinquencies. For this 21 argument, your Honor, I request that I approach the bench and 22 give you a few documents upon which these arguments are based. 23 I have four documents that I'm handing up. 24 I have to get a little bit into the weeds here, so 25 please bear with me. In this case, Ms. Giuffre -- well, school SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011326