4 H3VOGIU1 ih client made statements about. So we were trying to streamline 2 the case to the statements about Maxwell and her involvement 3 with Epstein. 4 So in the omnibus motion you'll see, for example, that 5 they have claimed she's made statements about other 6 individuals, and we say that that's not what's at issue, what's id at issue are the statements -- 8 THE COURT: That may be an issue of credibility. That 9 may be an issue of credibility. I'm talking about what we're 10 going to go to the jury on. Pi. MS. McCAWLEY: Yes. And that is the statements that 12 Maxwell made about my client. 13 THE COURT: And that's it. 14 MS. McCAWLEY: Yes, your Honor. 15 THE COURT: Let me ask the defense. Does that clarify 16 anything for you? de MS. MENNINGER: Could I have one second, your Honor? 18 THE COURT? Sure. Of ‘courses 19 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, I think it's slightly more 20 nuanced. Plaintiff has claimed our client's statement is 21 false. Our client's statement is not just limited to the 22 little snippets that they included in their complaint, it's the 23 entire statement. That entire statement talks about Virginia 24 Giuffre's allegations against Ms. Maxwell have been proven 29 untrue. SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. (212) 805-0300 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011307