188 190 003442 1 enforcement agency to provide flight logs relevant to ooa71s 41 that covered the jet were not just the David Rogers' ooaa4e 2 this investigation, 003720 2 flight logs, but there should be flight logs for other o03447 SO And rather than providing all the flight logs 003722 3 pilots which were not apparently being produced. 3440 4 that were available at that time, he appears to have 003725 4 And so, in light of all that, what I was oo34s2 § provided flight logs that went from January 2005 through oo3727 § seeing was a -- a production of flight logs that was 03457 6 September 2005, knowing that he appeared on an oo3732 6 incomplete. And then I started to hear from o301 7 October -- I may be off by one month here -- but on an ooa73s 7 Mr, Dershowitz that, well, these records prove oo3504 8 October 2005 flight log. oas737 8 conclusively I couldn't have done that. And I knew to oo3s06 9 So that, to my mind, had indicated that 003740 9 an absolute certainty, that the records were oo3s03 10 Professor Dershowitz was providing selective information 003742 10 inconsistent and inaccurate; and for somebody who had 03511 11 to law enforcement. Those concerns -- this is, you 003748 11 apparently carefully produced these records, to oo3615 12 know, there's -- there's more to it. 003744 12 represent that these conclusively prove that he wasn’t ooasia 13 The other problem was that the flight logs 03752 13 on the flights, seemed to me to be inaccurate 003522 14 ~=that Mr. Dershowitz had produced were inconsistent with 00:37:54 14 information. oo3s26 15 the flight logs that Dave Rogers, one of Mr. Epstein's oos7ss 15 So that was -- those were the kinds of things 003531 16 pilots had, so there were now inconsistencies on these oaa7se 16 =I was thinking about. oo3s35 17 flight logs. And it seemed to be -- it seemed to me to oos7so 17 Q. Mr. Cassell, is it your testimony -- 003539 18 be surprising that during the period of time where oose02 18 MR. SIMPSON: Well, first of