217 219 1 demonstrably false, but you could have easily 1 she has a history of lying, knowing that she is 2 discovered that the implication you were drawing was 2 easily suggestible, and they basically pressured 3 demonstrably false by simply taking one second and 3 her, according to my sources, into including me when 4 Googling her name as my wife did. 4 she didn't want to include me, because by including S BY MR. SCAROLA: S mie, they could make a claim, false as it was, could 6 Q. And so at 25 years old, she wasn't a young 6 make a false claim that a person who negotiated the 7 woman? 7 NPA was also criminally involved with her. 8 A. She was not the kind of woman that I was 8 They also lied -- lied unethically and 9 describing as underage. She was a mature, serious, 9 unprofessionally by saying that I negotiated that 10 I think I said in my public statements a model. I 10 provision of the NPA, which gave me, myself, any iL wasn't aware at the time that see was working for id kind of immunity from prosecution had I had improper 12 Victoria's Secrets, but Google demonstrates that. 12 sex with Virginia Roberts, which, of course, I did 13 And I described her exactly, in exactly the right 13 not. And that was one of the bases on which I was 14 terms, a serious person. 14 certain that they had engaged in unprofessional, i5 I always saw her dressed when I saw her -- is disbarrable and unethical conduct by including that 16 I saw her maybe on two or three occasions, dressed 16 provision, as well as including a provision that 17 appropriately. She was a serious adult worker and I 17 Prince Andrew was included because he, Prince 18 think you insult and demean her when you suggest 18 Andrew, pressured a United States attomey to try to 19 that anything other than that she was a serious 19 get a good deal for Jeffrey Epstein. 20 adult when she flew on that airplane. 20 That is so laughable. How any lawyer 21 Q. You were asked on the occasion of that 21 could put that in a plea