Fin Q: Can you tell us why? A: Well, I felt the handling- way the state attorney’s off | unusual. I knew that M | about this case. I felt tha } felt that the appropriate q. d the assignment AS governe CHAPTER 7 that his action met the st i ; from the statute in here. / ; f wouldn't return my phone 4 f The detective attempt \- state attorney’s office, Lar Videotaped Deposition of Michael Reiter in B.B. vs. t nounce that...and she w« a. a civil lawsuit against J effrey Epstein: P 4 the letter in hope that he v Epstein, 3000 3 realize that his objectivity November 23, a a case and ask the governor a ‘7 like that was necessary for Q: At some point you sent a letter to state atigeney Barry a a had been submitted to Hus : ‘octane: Took ts chuer pene wie ell mark as exhibit 3. Let a 4 Q: Could you tell us, explain onan si ow achance to read through this letter again to help 74 tivity may be lacking in r me give y' os ther words, what eviden refresh your recollection. 4 i ae ” ° Ee | x 5 you felt made it potentially fT dit. a A: I’ve - i vex fe Map of M0, Tn assuming based on what 4 q A: Well...when I first told h oe 3a. ' before that you had had some conversations with a q that it was a serious case, | a - her directly ... by phone —correct? — prior to this @ 4 land] that the suspect was Barry Krische q | it. And we were—it was i letter. if a Meeting that he and I we — by phone. ; 8 d conversations in person and ; | i 5 ok ‘But nonetheless in May—May 1, 2006—you felt i 4 a Known him to be a victim. : ay. 4 a f chi Q d to write this letter; is that correct? , = ° children. Well, I know tl need to q | ‘Statute that addresses tho A: Yes. : a 172 : { HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010513