Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP BCFi Document 1143 Filed 11/10/20 Page 1 of 2 BOIES SCHILLER FLEXNER November 10, 2020 VIA ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska District Court Judge United States District Court Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street New York, NY 10007 Re: v. Maxwell. Case No. 15-cv-7433-LAP Dear Judge Preska, Plaintiff writes concerning the Court's August 26 and 27, 2020, orders regarding the next steps in the Court's individualized review of the sealed materials, and deadlines set forth in the Order and Protocol for Unsealing Decided Motions (the "Protocol"). Dkts. 1107, 1108. A. Deadlines as to the Next Set of Motions The Court's August 27 order provided: "The Court will continue to review motions for Does 1 and 2 in chronological order. The Court will next review docket entries 231, 279, 315, 320, and 335, as well as documents relevant to those motions." Dkt. 1107 1 I. Pursuant to the Court's orders (Dkt. 1107 1 7; Dkt. 1133), Plaintiff served Doe 1 with Excerpts at his/her new address on October 22, 2020, and Does 1 and 2 did not submit any Non-Party Objections by their November 5, 2020, deadline. As such, under the Protocol any Party Objection to the materials related to docket entries 231, 279, 315, 320, and 335 is due on November 12, 2020, and any oppositions to such objections are due on November 19, 2020. See Dkt. 1108 ¶ 2f (providing that "the Original Parties shall have 7 days from the date on which the Non-Party's time to object expires to submit an objection to unsealing and an accompanying memorandum. Any opposition to such an objection shall be filed within 7 days"). B. Notification of Non-Parties The Court's August 27 order also provided: "The Original Parties shall send the Non-Party Notice to all remaining Non-Parties." Dkt. 1107 1 2. As Plaintiff explained in making this suggested edit to the Protocol, providing notice to all remaining Non-Parties speeds up the unsealing process by minimizing the number of Non-Party names tha