Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP Document 1031 Filed 02/26/20 Page 1 of 4 . . USDCSDNY DOCUMENT PI+ YrTRONICALLY FILED DOC #: DATE FILED: 2- 2 c-- UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK •••••••••1•S•maillS. •••••••••••••••••••.••••••;•••• Plaintiff, 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) -againstMEMORANDUM & ORDER GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. LORETTA A. PRESKA, Senior United States District Judge: Before the Court is a motion filed by Intervenors Julie and the Miami Herald Media Company ("the Intervenors") seeking reconsideration of the Court's January 13, 2020 opinion and order.' (See dkt. no. 1023.) For the following reasons, that motion is DENIED. "A motion for reconsideration is an extraordinary remedy to be employed sparingly in the interests of finality and conservation of scarce judicial resources." Inc., 818 internal F. Supp. 2d quotation Drapkin v. Mafco Consol. Grp., 678, 695 (S.D.N.Y. marks omitted). Such 2011) (citation and motions "are properly granted only if there is a showing of: (1) an intervening change 1 In that order, the Court explained the basis for its December 16, 2019 order, in which it concluded that "only motions actually decided by Judge Sweet--along with documents relevant to Judge Sweet's decisions on those motions--are properly considered judicial documents to which a presumption of public access attaches." (See January 13, 2020 Opinion & Order (the "January 13 Opinion"), dated January 13, 2020 (dkt. no. 1018].) 1 EFTA02781600