Case 1:15-cv-07433-LAP KRIEGER Document 1030 Filed 02/06/20 Page 1 of 5 & LEWIN LLP 500 Fifth Avenue New Yodc, NY 10110 'Telephone (212) 350-9550 www.KKIllpeom February 6, 2020 By ECF The Honorable Loretta A. Preska United States District Judge Southern District of New York 500 Pearl Street, Room 2220 New York, NY 10007-1312 Re: v. Maxwell, 15 Civ. 07433 (LAP) Dear Judge Preska: We write on behalf of anon-party, John Doe, in response to the parties' submissions, dated January 30, 2020, regarding the protocol that we previously proposed to the Court. See Defendant's Submission and Proposed Protocol, dated Jan. 30, 2020 (DE 1025) ("Defendant's Submission"); Plaintiff's Submission and Proposed Protocol, dated Jan. 30, 2020 (DE 1026) ("Plaintiff's Submission"); see also John Doe's Initial Proposed Protocol, dated Sept. 3, 2019 (DE 980), at 8-10; John Doe's Revised Proposed Protocol, dated Jan. 15, 2020 (DE 1019) ("John Doe's Submission"), at 2-4. After submitting their protocols, each party has also submitted briefs regarding the other's submission. See Defendant's Brief, dated Feb. 4, 2020 (DE 1028) ("Def. Br."); Plaintiff's Brief, dated Feb. 5, 2020 (DE 1029). We write to briefly address several modifications to, and omissions from, the parties' respective proposed protocols. 1. The Court Must Evaluate Whether Filings Associated With Adjudicated Motions are Judicial Both parties agree that the Court has already ruled that unadjudicated motions are nonjudicial; but they disagree as to whether the Court ought to review the adjudicated motions to determine whether associated filings are judicial. See Plaintiff's Submission at 2; Def. Br. at 4. We agree with the Defendant that the Court must review such filings associated with adjudicated motions and make the determination as to whether each is, in the first instance, a judicial record. In order to be deemed "judicial," it is not enough for a filing to simply have been filed in connection with ania llicated moti