Case .15cy074,N_fiE Mocument 100 FAlw6.0i613MIA015Page 1 of 2 REM tiAuu APR-15-2016 FRI ugra 7c CEDWIE Haddon, _V\ APR 152016 HADDON rc and Laura A. Menninger ISO Scat 10th Avenue Denver. Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 PA 303 832.2628 vnvw.nrnflow.com Imenningerehmflow.cOm JUDGE SWEET N N P. 02 April 15, 2016 Via Facsimile (212) /305-7925 Hon. Robert W. Sweet United States District Judge United States District Court Daniel Moynihan Courthouse Southern District ofNew York 500 Pearl Street, Room 1940 New York, New York 10007-1312 Re: v. Maxwell, I5-cv-07433-RWS Dear Judge Sweet: Plaintiffs counsel contends that Defendant's Reply in Support of Motion to Compel Responses to Defendant's First Set of Discovery Requests (Doc. #92) contains at page 9 information designated "Confidential" pursuant to this Court's Protective Order (Doc. #62). While we disagree, and contend that Plaintiff has waived any Confidentiality by making representations to the Court in her publicly filed Response regarding her medical records and the contents thereof, we nevertheless are requesting that the Reply be placed under seal and that we substitute for public filing a Reply which omits words from page 9 about which Plaintiff complains. Thank you for your consideration and we apologize to the Court for the inconvenience this disagreement has caused. Sincerely, HADDON, MORGAN AND 5 4/ P.C. Is/ Laura A. Menninger Laura A. Menninger EFTA02781406