XOW Woo Electronically Filed 10/02/2013 11:28:04 AM ET Epstein V. RRA, at ai. Page 27 Yet, with and RRA as her attorneys, L.M. did a '1110. at her A September, 2009 deposition in saying: A: . . . Once they were there, they were scared out ofAsk mind. They did it anyways and some of them walked Ottind said don't ever do this to me again. That was the thing that ever happened tome. (DT 170:8-11) . . . A: And then, a lot of gida weren't f. ;table. (DT 17113) The above represent only a few of the dramatic changes L.M. made in het testimony prior to her representation by hired RCYMSTEIN, RRA and after she and RRA. 48. As a result of the fraudulent Investment or (Portz') scheme, LM. may knowingly have compromised her alleged Intense:sin her Civil Action, or committed a fraud on the court )" 49. RRA and the litigation Team took an emotionally driven set of facts Involving alleged Innocent, unsuspecting, underage females and a Palm Beach Blilbnalre and sought to turn it Into a gold mine. Rather than evaluating and resolving the cases based on the merits (I.e. fads) which Included knowledgeable, voluntary and consensual actions by oath of the claimants end substantial pre-Epstein psychological ❑nd emotional conditions of each of the claimants and substantial sexual experiences preEpstein, RRA and the Litigation Team sought through protective orders and objections to block relevant discovery regarding their claimants. They Instead forged ahead with discovery the main purpose of which was to pressure Epstein into settling the cases. EFTA02772737