IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 50-2009-CA-040800-XXXX-MBAG CIVIL DIVISION "AG" JEFFREY EPSTEIN, tut Plaintiff, V. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, etc., et al., AcR e—i r Defendant(s). PRIVILEGE LOG PLAINTIFF TO PRODUCE A ORDER DIRECTING ASSERTED PRIVILEGES REVIEW OF PLAINTIFF' S FORANINCAMERA (AND SETTING STATUS CONFE4ENCE \\\ THISCAUSE / Jeffrey Epstein's ir came before the Court on Plain\ 'fko:Unter-Defendant A ,Clice ,ti s Request for Production and Net (the "Plaintiff') Objections to Defendant/Counte ullys viewed the Plaintiff's objections and all Worth Interrogatories. This Court, having applicable legal authority, and beit i tse ,) determine as follows: * fully advised in the premises does hereby CBACKGROUND On March 12, 2013, Coun entered an Order requiring the Plaintiff to file a detailed to Defendant/Counter-Plaintiff (the "Defendant") privilege log in po financial di quests for document production. The Order stated that the Plaintiff was not required to t any documents on the privilege log that he asserted were protected by his constitutional privilege against self-incrimination. The Plaintiff responded to this Court's Order by filing a privilege log wherein he asserted a Fifth Amendment privilege against selfincrimination as to essentially every document request, as well as asserting that many documents were protected by attorney-client privilege, accountant-client privilege, trade secret privilege, EFTA02772219