IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN individually, , individually, and J. L.M., individually, Defendant, ANSWER AND AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES TO SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Defendant, J. (EDWARDS), responds to Plaintiff's Introduction by stating that it is irrelevant surplusage requiring no answer. L ALLEGATIONS 1. Defendant, ies the allegations contained in paragraph 1 and demands strict proof thereof. 2. Admitted. il itly 3. itted. +4. - Cmitted. 5. Defendant, . denies the allegations contained in paragraph 5 and demands strict proof thereof. 6. Defendant, , is without knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations contained in paragraph 6 so therefore denies same and demands strict proof thereof. EFTA02770139