Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 354 Entered on FLSD Docket 01/14/2016 Page 1 of 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA CASE NO. 08-80736-CIV-MARRA JANE DOE NO. I AND JANE DOE NO. 2, Petitioners, vs. UNITED STATES, Respondent. RESPONDENT'S OPPOSITION TO PETITIONERS' MOTION TO COMPEL ANSWERS TO SUPPLEMENTAL REQUESTS FOR ADMISSION AND REQUESTS FOR PRODUCTION Respondent, by and through its undersigned counsel, files its Opposition to Petitioners' Motion to Compel Answers to Supplemental Requests for Admission and Requests for Production, and states: I. INTRODUCTION On April 7, 2015, this Court denied petitioners' motion to join Jane Doe No. 3 and Jane Doe No. 4. D.E. 324. The Court also struck allegations by Jane Doe No. 3, as to how she was sexually abused by Alan Dershowitz and others, finding that these lurid details are unnecessary to the determination of whether Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 should be permitted to join Petitioners' claim that the Government violated their rights under the CVRA. The factual details regarding with whom and where the Jane Does engaged in sexual activities are immaterial and impertinent to this central claim (i.e., that they were known victims of Mr. Epstein and the Government owed them CVRA duties), especially considering that these details involve non-parties who are not related to the respondent Government. These unnecessary details shall be stricken. EFTA02756042