Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 209 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/12/2013 Page 1 of 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES / JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S RESPONSE TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION FOR PROSPECTIVE LIMITED INTERVENTION AT THE REMEDY STAGE OF THESE PROCEEDINGS COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as "the victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to respond to Epstein's Motion for Prospective Limited Intervention at the Remedy Stage of These Proceedings (DE 207). Although his intervention is belated, the victims do not oppose Epstein's intervention at that late stage of the proceedings limited to the remedy issue so narrowly defined by Epstein. The victims would note, however, three consequences of that late and limited intervention. First, Epstein's intervention at that point would be subject to the law of the case — that is, he would be subject to all findings of fact made by the Court at that time; second, Epstein's intervention at that point would subject him to such discovery requests as the Court might find appropriate at that time; and third, his intervention would be (as he himself indicated) limited to the remedy of the rescission of the non-prosecution agreement. Subject to these three consequences to Epstein, the victims do not oppose his intervention. BACKGROUND I EFTA02754316