Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM Document 167 Entered on FLSD Docket 04/19/2012 Page 1 of 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 08-80736-Civ-Marra JANE DOE #1 and JANE DOE #2 v. UNITED STATES JANE DOE #1 AND JANE DOE #2'S RESPONSE TO SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING IN SUPPORT OF MOTION TO INTERVENE OF ROY BLACK, WEINBERG, AND JAY LEFKOWITZ COME NOW Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 (also referred to as 'The victims"), by and through undersigned counsel, to respond in opposition to the motion for protective orders filed by defense attorneys Roy Black, Weinberg, and Jay Lefkowitz and intervenor Jeffrey Epstein (DE 160, DE 161, and DE 162) (also called "supplemental briefing"). The victims point out that these motions are really just re-entered motions that had been filed earlier (DE 94). Out of an abundance of caution and to expedite this case, the victims now repeat their earlier filed response (DE 106) to the defense attorneys' and Epsteins' claims on the merits. The victims will refer to these claims as the "defense attorneys" claims, even though they are raised by both the attorneys and Epstein. The defense attorneys contend that the victims cannot use at trial (or even discover preliminarily) correspondence between them and the U.S. Attorney's Office arranging a highly unusual and secretive non-prosecution agreement. The victims have already explained at length why the correspondence between Epstein's lawyers and government prosecutors is simply not 1 EFTA02753831